The 17 th Karmapa Thaye Dorje met with the ‘Alternative Karmapa’ Ogyen Dorje and they
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Also it is not good, that the two Karmapas in their declaration do not mention the Evil Communist Chinese Empire’s corruptive influence on all Buddhist traditions in both China and Tibet. This is a gigantic problem with enormous implications, that stack on top of the rather old fashioned ways of all Buddhist traditions of Asia, that makes educated people think of Buddhism as something belonging to the past, at least in Asia. It is also like that for the Christians in the world at large, but they are not threatened by the Evil Communist Chinese Empire’s corruptive influence, dictatorial interventions and suppressive misuse of power in general. Anyway not in Europe.
The two Karmapas’ declaration also do not relate to – nor explore – the defining difference between the two. Karmapa Thaye Dorje did appoint himself in his very early childhood, when he with his very first words in this life declared that he was the Tulku of the 16th Karmapa. While Ogyen Dorje has always stressed, that he had no memory of his former life, also not as a baby. With some other words, he is appointed by someone else. How the two will address this issue, we do not know. But it makes them unequal.
Likewise, there is no news about Rumtek Monastery in Sikkim, that has been disputed for a very long time. A lawsuit about the ownership is still undecided with both Karmapas claiming the right of ownership.
So our hands are still glued to the burning hot oven, that really hurts. Nothing is really clarified by this declaration. Of course, it must be a hard nut to crack for anyone in a so complicated situation. Anyway, it still hurts badly.
The positive thing naturally is, that the two Karmapas are in a dialogue and share an intent of reconciliation of our divided tradition. They made this intention known publicly in 2018. So it would seem, that the two just want to confirm this intention, because otherwise there is nothing new really in this last message. All that is of course very well, but the mentioned omissions are quite deplorable. The two have to relate to their inherent inequality, the treachery of Ogyen Dorje’s teachers and the Evil Communist Chinese Empire. These are quite enormous challenges in the culture of silence, that characterise the Tibetan Tulku tradition. It is not only about Shamarpa.
This is the third time the two Karmapas have met. But it is remarkable, that no development seems to have taken place in their relationship, even it is several years ago they last met. I wonder, if Ogyen Dorje imagines that every Karma Kagyu Tulku must go through the same process like the new Shamarpa is supposed to, so in the future only one Tulku of each kind will be appointed, recognized and jointly educated by both Karmapas. If so, the Karmapa conflict will last until they both are dead and gone, if there upon only one Karmapa is recognized. That would be an awful lot of time to wait for a resolution to the problem of two official Karmapas at the same time, while they in fact are unequal.
This feels like embarrassment by touch, instead of addressing all the problems one at a time – and solve them, even the corruption of some Lamas hereby are displayed and the Evil Communist Chinese Empire is confronted. Now, this last thing is maybe impossible on a practical level, because so many Karma Kagyu monasteries still exists in Tibet proper. And it is the hypocrisy of the Evil Empire that rules here, and it does not tolerate any opposition.
But meanwhile, the world is distancing itself from the Evil Communist Chinese Empire, after giving up on waiting for reforms and in fear of losing investments there. Now people are aspiring for democracy and transparency ever more everywhere.
Read the declaration here
Read also about the Evil Communist Chinese Empire’s corruptive influence on all Buddhist traditions in Asia in the paper of Arnauld Dotézac.
Read also about the first meeting in 2018.
![]() |
![]() |
|
Is the top-banner missing? Then: Click here |
|||||
|
Læs artiklen på dansk - Read the paper in Danish |
|||||